Skip to content
Menu
NathanShumate.com
  • Buy My Art
  • Buy My Words
  • Contact Me!
NathanShumate.com
December 15, 2022

There’s wrong, and then there’s impressively wrong.

Having been a studious member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for my entire life, I thought that I had encountered at least one version of every “anti-Mormon” distortion (or fabrication) of Latter-day Saint belief in circulation. But, impressively, I recently discovered some hitherto unknown little-known “facts” about “Mormon” doctrines that, stunned, I could only salute the author. Well done, sir.

This was in Grail Knights of North America by Michael Bradley, a 1998 nonfiction volume of the Holy Blood, Holy Grail / DaVinci Code vein.  I often read books that I know I’ll mostly disagree with, just to see what interesting ideas there are.  (Also, I’m a longtime Oak Island aficionado, so transatlantic Templars always catch my attention.)

After a lot of stuff about Templars, Masons, Egyptians, Atlanteans, etc., the author is discussing the possibility of Jesus having been married — and to multiple women — and then includes this digression:


Like I said: Stunned. Why, I hadn’t even heard of many of these things that my fellow Latter-day Saints  and I supposedly believe! There’s about ten percent truth in here, mixed with assertions so stunningly wrong that I want to know where they came from, as they can’t just be simple misunderstandings or misremembered distortions of real Latter-day Saint doctrines.  (Alas, unlike most of the book, there were absolutely no endnotes for this passage; we are, apparently, to take Bradley’s declarations as unquestioned fact, no matter their provenance.)

And so I set the book aside.  Not for any personal offense; I simply couldn’t trust it anymore. If I discovered unsupported falsehood presented as documented fact in a section of the book on whose subject matter I’m an expert, why would I trust “facts” presented anywhere else in the book to be any more trustworthy when I can’t personally fact-check them?

Spread the love

4 thoughts on “There’s wrong, and then there’s impressively wrong.”

  1. Jaleta Clegg says:
    December 15, 2022 at 10:31 am

    Wow. Just wow.

    1. Nathan says:
      December 15, 2022 at 10:49 am

      INORITE?

  2. False Profiteer says:
    December 15, 2022 at 1:18 pm

    Too bad he didn’t end that passage, “…don’t believe everything you see on television or read in books.”

  3. Helge says:
    January 4, 2023 at 10:25 pm

    There may even be intentional lies, because that’s good stuff, there, punch up the subject and everything. I even wonder if this Bradley was the inspiration to Blaylock’s “Knights of the Cornerstone.”

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

  • RK on The worth of souls.
  • Nathan on The worth of souls.
  • RK on The worth of souls.
  • Nathan on Movies Seen Recently: [something clever with the number seven]
  • Deevs on Movies Seen Recently: [something clever with the number seven]

Follow me on X

My Tweets

Subscribe via Email

Just Listened To: What I Just Listened To

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

Spreading the Nathan Around

  • Lousy Book Covers
  • Cover Critics
  • CheapCaffeine.net
  • Cold Fusion Media

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2025 NathanShumate.com | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!